AN IDEAL CASE TO REVIEW THE RULES OF QUORUM AND MAJORITY TO DECIDE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NATION'S SUPREME JUSTICE
Keywords:
unanimity, legal number, con judge, votes, terminological differencesAbstract
This article takes a recent Supreme Court case which looks like quorum and majority to decide´s rules were not fulfilled. Its objective is to remember the concepts of: quorum, absolute majority, relative majority, majority to decide, comparing the rules for the Supreme Court of the United States with the rules for the argentinian Supreme Court, and make a brief analysis about the pros and cons of the Argentinian system. Then, it is explained the rules for con-judges. Finally, it is argue the validity of this sentence sustained on terminological differences, with a critic about the words some justices used.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lucas E. Bolos Ingrao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Más información en: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
-
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
-
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
-
CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la lamisma licencia del original.
